Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPinchao, Lu
dc.date2016
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T13:47:09Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T13:47:09Z
dc.identifier.issn2444-832X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10612/13951
dc.description.abstract本文借助语用论辩学的研究框架,分析《纽 约时报》涉华读者来信中 “人身攻击”论证的 使用,并对其使用的合理性进行评价。研究结 果显示:《纽约时报》涉华“读者来信”中的人 身攻击论证主要可分为三个子类型:辱骂型(侮 辱他人)、境况型(怀疑动机)和“你也是”型 (你也这样做),部分“人身攻击”论证的使用 合理,部分“人身攻击”论证的使用引起谬误。 其中造成不合理的“人身攻击”论证使用的原 因主要是:(1)其论证的使用阻碍了反方提出 质疑或相反立场;(2)在逻辑上存在缺陷或无 效,经不起批判性问题的检视。鉴于此,我们建 议相关话语主体在类似话语实践中使用论证时 应注意:(1)根据语用论辩学的批判性讨论准 则(“十大诫律”),合理设计论证;(2)将受 众视为罪严苛的理性评判者,确保论证能够经 得起任何形式的批判性检视,维护自身理性、 负责任的形象。 This article under the research framework of pragma-dialectics, analyses the use of personal attacks in the China-related Letters to the Editor of The New York Times, and evaluates its reasonableness. The research results show that the personal attacks in the China-related Letters to the Editor of The New York Times can be mainly classified into three subtypes: the abusive variant (insult others), the circumstantial variant (suspect motives) and the tu quoque (you also). Both reasonable and unreasonable use of personal attack are identified. The unreasonable use of personal attack is mainly caused by: (1) the use of personal attack prevents the opponents from casting doubts or proposing his or her standpoint; (2) the use of personal attack has deficiency or even is invalid in logic, failing in the examination of critical questions. On account of this, the related discourse subjects in similar kind of discourse practice, should: (1) design their arguments reasonably according to the code of conduct of critical discussion (Ten Commandments); (2) consider the audience as an extremely rigor one, making sure that the argument can pass any critical examination, and so the rational and responsible figure of the proponents can be guaranteed.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad de León: Instituto Confucioes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectComunicaciónes_ES
dc.subjectCulturaes_ES
dc.subject.otherThe New York Timeses_ES
dc.subject.otherCartas al editores_ES
dc.subject.otherPragmáticaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDialécticaes_ES
dc.titleA Pragma-Dialectical Study of Personal Attack in China-Related Letters to the Editorof The New York Timeses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodicales_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.18002/sin.v3i2.5262
dc.identifier.essn2531-2219
dc.journal.titleSinología hispánicaes_ES
dc.volume.number3es_ES
dc.issue.number2es_ES
dc.page.initial79es_ES
dc.page.final100es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional