RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Evaluation of Three Methods for CPR Training to Lifeguards: A Randomised Trial Using Traditional Procedures and New Technologies
A1 González Santano, Daniel
A1 Fernández García, Daniel
A1 Silvestre Medina, Elena
A1 Remuiñán Rodríguez, Beatriz
A1 Rosell Ortiz, Fernando
A1 Gómez Salgado, Juan
A1 Sobrido Prieto, María
A1 Ordás Campos, Beatriz
A1 Martínez Isasi, Santiago
A2 Enfermeria
K1 Enfermería
K1 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
K1 Education
K1 Teaching
K1 Mobile application
K1 Applied health technology
K1 Health technology products
K1 3205.01 Cardiología
K1 3205.08 Enfermedades Pulmonares
K1 3212 Salud Publica
AB [EN] Background and objectives: When the drowning timeline evolves and drowning occurs, the lifeguard tries to mitigate the event by applying the last link of the drowning survival chain with the aim of treating hypoxia. Quality CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) and the training of lifeguards are the fundamental axes of drowning survival. Mobile applications and other feedback methods have emerged as strong methods for the learning and training of basic CPR in the last years so, in this study, a randomised clinical trial has been carried out to compare the traditional method as the use of apps or manikins with a feedback system as a method of training to improve the quality of resuscitation. Materials and Methods: The traditional training (TT), mobile phone applications (AP) and feedback manikins (FT) are compared. The three cohorts were subsequently evaluated through a manikin providing feedback, and a data report on the quality of the manoeuvres was obtained. Results: Significant differences were found between the traditional manikin and the manikin with real-time feedback regarding the percentage of compressions with correct depth (30.8% (30.4) vs. 68.2% (32.6); p = 0.042). Hand positioning, percentage correct chest recoil and quality of compressions exceeded 70% of correct performance in all groups with better percentages in the FT (TT vs. FT; p < 0.05). Conclusions: As a conclusion, feedback manikins are better learning tools than traditional models and apps as regards training chest compression. Ventilation values are low in all groups, but improve with the feedback manikin.
PB MDPI
LK https://hdl.handle.net/10612/18718
UL https://hdl.handle.net/10612/18718
NO González-Santano, D., Fernández-García, D., Silvestre-Medina, E., Remuiñán-Rodríguez, B., Rosell-Ortiz, F., Gómez-Salgado, J., Sobrido-Prieto, M., Ordás-Campos, B., & Martínez-Isasi, S. (2020). Evaluation of three methods for cpr training to lifeguards: A randomised trial using traditional procedures and new technologies. Medicina (Lithuania), 56(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEDICINA56110577
DS BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
RD 30-may-2024