In this paper we present a new methodology which, while allowing for anonymous interaction, it also makes possible to
compare decisions of cooperating or defecting when playing games within a group, according to whether or not players
personally trust each other. The design thus goes beyond standard approaches to the role of trust in fostering cooperation,
which is restricted to general trust. It also allows considering the role of the topology of the social network involved may
play in the level of cooperation found. The results of this work support the idea that personal trust promotes cooperation
beyond the level of general trust. We also found that this effect carries over to the whole group, making it more cohesive,
but that higher levels of cohesion rely on a particular topology. As a conclusion, we hypothesize that personal trust is a
psychological mechanism evolved to make human social life possible in the small groups our ancestors lived in, and that
this mechanism persists and plays a role in sustaining cooperation and social cohesion.
