Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorFacultad de Veterinariaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez García, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorSol, Cinta
dc.contributor.authorDe Nova, Pedro J. G.
dc.contributor.authorPuyalto, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorMesas, Luis
dc.contributor.authorPuente Fernández, Héctor 
dc.contributor.authorMencía Ares, Óscar 
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Rodríguez, Héctor 
dc.contributor.authorRubio Nistal, Pedro Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorCarvajal Urueña, Ana María 
dc.contributor.otherSanidad Animales_ES
dc.date2019-12-27
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T09:56:54Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T09:56:54Z
dc.identifier.citationGómez-García, M., Sol, C., De Nova, P. J. G., Puyalto, M., Mesas, L., Puente, H., Mencía-Ares, Ó., Miranda, R., Argüello, H., Rubio, P., & Carvajal, A. (2019). Antimicrobial activity of a selection of organic acids, their salts and essential oils against swine enteropathogenic bacteria. Porcine Health Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40813-019-0139-4es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2055-5660
dc.identifier.otherhttps://porcinehealthmanagement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40813-019-0139-4es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10612/17949
dc.description.abstract[EN] Background Accurate screening of new alternative antimicrobial compounds is essential for their use to control pathogens in swine production due to the replacement of antibiotics and zinc oxide. Most in vitro studies have separately reported the antimicrobial activity of organic acids and essential oils (EOs) using diverse methods for susceptibility testing. In addition, in vitro outcomes can help in the selection of the suitable antimicrobial compound and effective combinations of these compounds in the control of pathogens of interest in pork production. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determinate the antibacterial activity of six organic acids and six EOs against Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Clostridium perfringens isolates, some of them multi-resistant to antibiotics, from swine origin. The synergistic effects between the products with higher activity for each bacteria were also calculated. Results All products tested showed activity against at least one bacterial species, except for black pepper EO. The results showed that formic acid with the shortest chain length was the most effective against E. coli and Salmonella spp., while the sodium salt of coconut fatty acid distillates with long chain acids was the most effective against C. perfringens. The susceptibility of isolates tested to EOs was similar, a result that demonstrates a similar activity of these products against phylogenetically unrelated pathogens. In addition, an additive effect was shown for carvacrol-oregano EO for E. coli, formic acid-carvacrol and formic acid-thymol for Salmonella spp. and carvacrol-cinamaldehyde for C. perfringens. Conclusions The susceptibility of isolates to EOs was similar, a result that demonstrates a similar activity of these products against phylogenetically unrelated pathogens in contrast to organic acids. In addition, an additive effect was shown for several combinations of these compounds.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSanidad animales_ES
dc.subjectVeterinariaes_ES
dc.subject.otherPiges_ES
dc.subject.otherFeed additiveses_ES
dc.subject.otherOrganic acidses_ES
dc.subject.otherEssential oilses_ES
dc.subject.otherMinimum inhibitory concentrationes_ES
dc.subject.otherMinimum bactericidal concentrationes_ES
dc.subject.otherFractional inhibitory concentrationes_ES
dc.subject.otherEnteric pathogenses_ES
dc.titleAntimicrobial activity of a selection of organic acids, their salts and essential oils against swine enteropathogenic bacteriaes_ES
dc.title.alternativeActividad antimicrobiana de una selección de ácidos orgánicos, sus sales y aceites esenciales frente a bacterias enteropatógenas porcinases_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0139-4
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn2055-5660
dc.journal.titlePorcine Health Managementes_ES
dc.volume.number5es_ES
dc.issue.number32es_ES
dc.page.initial1es_ES
dc.page.final8es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.unesco3109 Ciencias Veterinariases_ES
dc.subject.unesco3104 Producción Animales_ES
dc.description.projectThis work was supported by Norel SA.es_ES
dc.description.projectWe acknowledge the excellent technique assistance provided by Gloria F. Bayón, Sara Costillas and Diana Álvarez and the contribution in some parts of the research by Sandra González from Aquilón CyL S.L. Manuel Gómez was supported by grants from Junta de Castilla y León cofinanced by the European Social Fund (LE131-18) and University of León (Ayuda Predoctoral Puente Formativa 2017). Héctor Argüello is granted by the Spanish Ministry of Education under the programme “Beatriz Galindo” (BEAGAL-18-106). Óscar Mencía (FPU16/03485) and Héctor Puente (FPU17/ 00466) are supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education.es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional