Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAvendaño Coy, Juan
dc.contributor.authorGómez Soriano, Julio
dc.contributor.authorValencia Prieto, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorEstrada, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorLeal, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Campa, Rafael
dc.contributor.otherFisioterapiaes_ES
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:57:54Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:57:54Z
dc.identifier.citationAvendaño-Coy, J., Gómez-Soriano, J., Valencia, M., Estrada, J., Leal, F., & Ruiz-Campa, R. (2014). Botulinum toxin type a and myofascial pain syndrome: A retrospective study of 301 patients. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 27(4), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-140470.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10612/18057
dc.description.abstract[EN] Background: Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) intramuscular injections have been used for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), although its efficacy remains still unknown and its safety is controversial. Objective: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of the injection protocol for BTX-A in the shoulder-scapular and lumbar-pelvic girdles combined with physiotherapy in patients with primary and secondary MPS. Methods: Retrospective descriptive study including 301 medical files of patients with persistent MPS. Positive responses to treatment were considered to be a satisfactory level of effectiveness with 50% pain relief or a fully satisfactory level of effectiveness at 80%. Results: Overall, 58.1% of patients obtained a positive result at 6 months. Differences in effectiveness were found between primary MPS (82.9% of patients) and secondary MPS (54.9%; p=0.002). In patients with secondary MPS, differences in effectiveness arose based on pathologies associated with MPS (p=0.03). In 23.9% of cases, mild and temporary adverse effects were observed post-infiltration. Conclusions: BTX-A injections and physiotherapy is an alternative to conventional treatment which should be considered when treating refractory MPS. Nonetheless, the differences in effectiveness based on diagnosis suggest the need to clarify the criteria used to select patients with MPS in future clinical trials and applications.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherIOS Presses_ES
dc.subjectFisioterapiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherBotulinum toxin type Aes_ES
dc.subject.otherMyofascial pain syndromeses_ES
dc.subject.otherAdverse effectses_ES
dc.titleBotulinum toxin type a and myofascial pain syndrome: A retrospective study of 301 patientses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-140470
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1878-6324
dc.journal.titleJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitationes_ES
dc.volume.number27es_ES
dc.issue.number4es_ES
dc.page.initial485es_ES
dc.page.final492es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem