Compartir
Título
Editorial: Acute: Chronic Workload Ratio: Is There Scientific Evidence?
Autor
Facultad/Centro
Área de conocimiento
Título de la revista
Frontiers in Physiology
Cita Bibliográfica
Zouhal, H.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Ali, A.; Granacher, U.; Boullosa Álvarez, D. A. (2021). Editorial: Acute: Chronic Workload Ratio: Is There Scientific Evidence?. Frontiers in Physiology, 12
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Fecha
2021
Resumen
[EN] The scientific monitoring of athletes is fundamental to determine and understand the individual
biological responses to training (Halson, 2014). In elite sports, it is crucial to regularly monitor
training and performance to detect biopositive or negative responses that can be used to effectively
program training according to the needs of each athlete (Bourdon et al., 2017). Moreover, workload
monitoring can also help to assess fatigue and indicate the need for recovery in different physically
demanding situations to ultimately avoid injuries (Halson, 2014). As there is evidence that lower
injury rates are associated with higher team sport performances (Eirale et al., 2013), sport scientists
and medical staff should regularly and accurately evaluate athletes’ injury risk using workload
measures (Halson, 2014)
Materia
Palabras clave
URI
DOI
Aparece en las colecciones
- Artículos [4867]
Ficheros en el ítem
Tamaño:
373.2
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.size-kilobytes
Formato:
Adobe PDF