Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorFacultad de Ciencias Biologicas y Ambientaleses_ES
dc.contributor.authorFavret, Colin
dc.contributor.authorNieto Nafría, Juan Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorMier Durante, Milagros Pilar 
dc.contributor.authorSano, Masakazu
dc.contributor.authorAkimoto, Shin-Ichi
dc.contributor.authorBarbagallo, Sebastiano
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarti, Samiran
dc.contributor.authorPérez Hidalgo, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorQiao, Ge-Xia
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Gary L.
dc.contributor.authorStekolshchikov, Andrey V.
dc.contributor.authorWegierek, Piotr
dc.contributor.otherZoologiaes_ES
dc.date2010-03-25
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-22T12:44:03Z
dc.date.available2016-02-22T12:44:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-22
dc.identifier.citationZootxa, 2010,n. 2410es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10612/5091
dc.descriptionP. 65-68es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe aphidologist community attending the Seventh International Symposium on Aphids in Fremantle (Western Australia, 2005) entrusted to us the preparation of a Part of the List of Available Names in Zoology devoted to the aphid genus-group taxa names, and this to be presented at the subsequent aphid symposium. During the course of our work (Nieto Nafría et al. 2009), we checked each genus to make sure its type species designation conformed to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999) ―henceforth The Code and The Commission―, and that these designations were correctly represented in the literature, especially the two most recent taxonomic catalogues (Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers 1976; Remaudière & Remaudière 1997). Previous authors have used most of the procedures of type fixation enumerated in The Code, The Commission itself has used its Plenary Powers to fix six type species, and 11 genus-group names remain without types (Table 1). In the recent aphid taxonomic catalogues (Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers op. cit.; Remaudière & Remaudière op. cit.), we found three errors caused by mistakes propagated in the literature and two errors caused by incorrect application of Article 11 of The Code. We have also found that in the case of 11 names, the criteria of Article 70.3 of The Code were not met, and regardless, earlier editions of The Code did not allow type designations of that kind (see the last paragraph of the example in Article 70.3). This article corrects the five errors and conforms the 11 aphid type species designations to the nomenclatural standards of The Code.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherMagnolia Presses_ES
dc.subjectBiologíaes_ES
dc.subjectEcología. Medio ambientees_ES
dc.subjectZoologíaes_ES
dc.subject.otherAphididaees_ES
dc.subject.otherAphidses_ES
dc.titleType species of genera in Aphididae (Hemiptera Sternorrhyncha) with two new generic synonymieses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem