Landscape heterogeneity as a surrogate of biodiversity in mountain systems: what is the most appropriate spatial analytical unit?

Repositorio Dspace/Manakin

Landscape heterogeneity as a surrogate of biodiversity in mountain systems: what is the most appropriate spatial analytical unit?

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas y Ambientales es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Llamas, Paula
dc.contributor.author Calvo Galván, Leonor
dc.contributor.author Cruz, Marcelino de la
dc.contributor.author Suárez Seoane, Susana
dc.contributor.other Ecologia es_ES
dc.date 2017-02
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-03T16:52:23Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-03T16:52:23Z
dc.date.issued 2018-03-03
dc.identifier.citation Ecological indicators, 2018, vol. 85 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10612/7435
dc.description P. 285-294 es_ES
dc.description.abstract The estimated potential of landscape metrics as a surrogate for biodiversity is strongly dependent on the spatial analytical unit used for evaluation. We assessed the relationship between terrestrial vertebrate species richness (total and taxonomic) and structural landscape heterogeneity, testing the impact of using different spatial analytical units in three mountain systems in Spain. Landscape heterogeneity was quantified through an additive partitioning of the Shannon diversity index of landscape classes. Both landscape heterogeneity and species richness were calculated using two spatial analytical unit approaches: eco-geographic vs. arbitrary (i.e., watersheds vs. square windows of different sizes 20 × 20 km, 50 × 50 km, 100 × 100 km). We predicted species richness on the basis of landscape heterogeneity by fitting separate linear models for each spatial analytical unit approach. The main results obtained showed that landscape heterogeneity influenced terrestrial vertebrate species richness. However, the emerging relationships were dependent on the spatial analytical unit approach. The eco-geographic approach showed significant relationships between landscape heterogeneity and total and taxonomic species richness in almost all cases (except mammals). Considering the arbitrary approach, landscape heterogeneity appeared as a predictor of species richness only for mammals and breeding birds and at the coarsest spatial scales. Our results claim for further consideration of eco-geographical spatial analytical unit approaches in biodiversity studies and show that the methods of this study offer a valuable cost-effective framework for biodiversity management and spatial modeling, with potential to be adapted to national and global applications. es_ES
dc.language eng es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.subject Biología es_ES
dc.subject Ecología. Medio ambiente es_ES
dc.subject Zoología es_ES
dc.subject.other Habitat diversity es_ES
dc.subject.other Mammals es_ES
dc.subject.other Birds es_ES
dc.subject.other Reptiles es_ES
dc.subject.other Terrestrial vertebrates es_ES
dc.subject.other Watersheds es_ES
dc.title Landscape heterogeneity as a surrogate of biodiversity in mountain systems: what is the most appropriate spatial analytical unit? es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewed SI es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es_ES

Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver
2 - Landscape heterogeneity as a surrogate.pdf 2.296Mb PDF Ver/Abrir

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en BULERIA


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta

Estadísticas