• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
Consorcio BUCLE Recolector
  • Contact Us
  • Send Feedback
  • Enlaces y accesos
    • Derechos de autor
    • Políticas
    • Guía de autoarchivo
    • FAQ y ayuda
    • La ULE y el Acceso Abierto
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Repositorio
    Institucional
    Abierto

    Consorcio BUCLE Recolector

    Browse

    All of BULERIACommunities and CollectionsAuthorsDirectoresTitlesSubjectsFacultad/CentroÁrea de conocimientoFecha de creación/publicaciónTitulaciónThis CollectionAuthorsDirectoresTitlesSubjectsFacultad/CentroÁrea de conocimientoFecha de creación/publicaciónTitulación

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Otros enlaces

    View Item 
    •   BULERIA Home
    • Scientific Production
    • Untitled
    • View Item
    •   BULERIA Home
    • Scientific Production
    • Untitled
    • View Item

    Compartir

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Título
    The Absence of Any Right to 'Remedial Secession' in International Law
    Autor
    Escudero Espinosa, Juan FranciscoAutoridad Buleria
    Facultad/Centro
    Facultad de Derecho
    Área de conocimiento
    Derecho Internacional Publico y Relaciones Internacionales
    Datos de la obra
    Spanish Yearbook of International Law 22, 2018
    Editor
    Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
    Fecha
    2018-12-30
    Abstract
    The theory of remedial secession puts forward the idea of an opinio that considers it licit to exercise external self-determination in contexts of oppression and grave violations of human rights. This view would be supported by just a few cases in international practice. For the most part, the international community has been reluctant to recognize it, even though only Bangladesh and Kosovo came to secede in accordance with its precepts. Indeed, even the Kosovo case raises doubts about whether it should be seen as a remedial secession. In view of these facts, it becomes necessary to note the deep-rooted and unquestionable existence of just such an opinio juris. This requires the argumentation advanced by new entities in justifying secession to fall in line with the theory, rather than that the result achieved should match a claimed emerging right to remedial secession. In neither of the two instances did the new entities allude to exercising a right to remedial secession. International practice would appear to show that States are not convinced that such a right should be recognized.
    Materia
    Derecho Internacional Público
    Palabras clave
    Remedial Secession
    Secession
    Self-Determination
    Peer review
    SI
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10612/9440
    Collections
    • Untitled [2723]
    Show full item record
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    2018 The Absence of Any Right to 'Remedial Secession' in International Law (SYbIL 22, 2018, pp. 393-402).pdf
    Tamaño:
    3.196Mb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen