2024-03-29T11:42:54Zhttp://buleria.unileon.es/oai/requestoai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/112862023-05-30T11:13:25Zcom_10612_17col_10612_21
Escuela de Ingenierias Industrial, Informática y Aeroespacial
García Sierra, Juan Felipe
Carriegos Vieira, Miguel
Balsa, Jesús
Sánchez, Fernando
Fernández, Mario
Fernández, Alejandro
Cadenas, Cristian
Rodríguez, Javier
Lebedev, Vladislav
Algebra
2017-06
2019-11-02T15:51:25Z
2019-11-02T15:51:25Z
III Jornadas Nacionales de Investigación en Ciberseguridad, 31 de mayo-2 de junio, 2017, Madrid
978-84-608-4659-8
http://hdl.handle.net/10612/11286
We present a prospective study for performance comparison between programs written in C language and the same programs reviewed and modified to be compliant with CMU SEI CERT C Secure Coding Standard and with MISRA C, the most relevant Secure Coding Standards in existence nowadays. Our initial results show that, as expected, any of the Secure Coding Standards is susceptible to have a negative impact on performance, increasing program running time. We have also found that MISRA C Standard may be less likely to affect code performance than SEI CERT C Standard is, and that it may produce a more optimal code than SEI CERT Standard does; however, further research is needed for proper confirmation of these results.
eng
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Informática
Estándar de codificación segura
CMU CERT
SEI CERT
MISRA
Rendimiento
Secure Coding Standard
1203.08 Código y Sistemas de Codificación
1203.23 Lenguajes de Programación
C Secure Coding Standards Performance: CMU SEI CERT vs MISRA
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion