2024-03-28T21:14:39Zhttp://buleria.unileon.es/oai/requestoai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/64692020-12-10T09:01:05Zcom_10612_17col_10612_18
Facultad de Veterinaria
Río, M.L. del
Gutiérrez Martín, César Bernardo
Rodríguez Ferri, Elías Fernando
Sanidad Animal
2003-02-22
2017-08-01T22:37:29Z
2017-08-01T22:37:29Z
2017-08-02
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, vol. 41, n. 2
http://hdl.handle.net/10612/6469
P. 880-882
An indirect hemagglutination test (IHA) and a coagglutination test (CA) were evaluated using saline, boiled,
and autoclaved extracts for serotyping Haemophilus parasuis. CA showed several cross-reactions, whereas IHA
gave rise to specific reactions, with minor exceptions. IHA was further compared with the immunodiffusion test
(the “gold standard”) for the serotyping of 67 field isolates. As a conclusion, IHA is recommended as a useful
method for sensitive and specific serotyping of H. parasuis
SI
eng
American Society for Microbiology
Sanidad animal
Veterinaria
Haemophilus parasuis
Coagglutination Tests
Value of Indirect Hemagglutination and Coagglutination Tests for Serotyping Haemophilus parasuis
info:eu-repo/semantics/article