RT info:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodical
T1 A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Trade Friction Discourse: A Case Study of a Public Letter in Sino-US Trade Friction on Tire Special Safeguard
A1 Peng, Wu
A1 Rui, Zhao
K1 Economía
K1 Política
K1 Dialéctica
AB 本文借助语用论辩学的策略操控分析方法，分析 2009 年 7 月 27 日中国五矿化工产品进出口商会（CCCMC）、中国橡胶工业协会(CRIA)致奥巴马和美国贸易代表（USTR）的公开信中的论辩策略，试图深入剖析中方在此轮胎贸易摩擦中运用的论辩策略及其语言实现手段。研究结果显示，公开信策略操控综合体现在潜在话题选择、迎合听众需求和选择表达手段三个方面，主要使用了预设、对比、诉诸普遍价值观、诉诸权威、模糊表达、重复、统计、诉诸对手妥协之处等不同的策略。但是，中方在冲突阶段的意见分歧界定、开始阶段出发点的选择、论辩阶段话题选择三个方面，以及对比、统计等具体话语策略的使用上出现了一些偏差。有鉴于此，我们建议中方在今后的贸易论辩话语中应：(1)明确论辩话语的冲突、开始、论辩和结束四个重要阶段，在清楚界定每个阶段论辩目标的同时，合理、巧妙地设置各阶段的修辞目标；(2)根据不同阶段的论辩和修辞目标灵活选择合适有效的策略操控方式；(3)认清贸易摩擦话语的机构性语境，树立坚定自信的形象。 Based on the analytical framework of Strategic Maneuvering, this paper analyzes and evaluates the public letter from China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) and China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) to Obama and United States Trade Representative (USTR) on July 27th, 2009 to reveal the discursive strategies and their corresponding linguistic realizations manipulated in tire special safeguard case. The research results show that, strategic maneuvering in CCCMC & CRIA’s public letters is integratedly realized through choice of topical potential, catering for audience demands and choice of presentational devices, which is supported by such argumentative strategies as presupposition, contrast, appeal to audience's values, appeal to authority, vagueness, repetition, statistics, appeal to opponent ’ s concession, and the like. CCCMC & CRIA’s public letter has its shortcomings in clarification of difference of opinion in the confrontation stage, in choice of starting in the opening stage, in choice of topics in the argumentation stage and in manipulation of such specific argumentative rhetoric strategies as ‘contrast’ and ‘statistics’. In view of China’s merits and deficiency, China should: (1) clarify the confrontation, opening, argumentation and concluding stages of the argumentative discourse and flexibly set the dialectic and rhetoric aims of these four stages according to the context; (2) strategically maneuver among topical potential, audience demand and presentational devices, in line with the established dialectic and rhetoric aims in different argumentative stages; (3) recognizethe institutional context of trade friction discourse and the importance of language expression, and cultivate an assertive image.
PB Universidad de León: Instituto Confucio
SN 2444-832X
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10612/13932
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10612/13932
DS BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
RD 20-abr-2024