Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorFacultad de Ciencias Biologicas y Ambientaleses_ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Macías, Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorPaz Cabello, Paulino de 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pastor, Felipe 
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez García, Mercedes 
dc.contributor.authorGomes Alves, Susana Cláudia
dc.contributor.authorBernardo, Jana
dc.contributor.authorAnel Rodríguez, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorAnel Rodríguez, Luis 
dc.contributor.otherBiologia Celulares_ES
dc.date2007-04
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T13:34:09Z
dc.date.available2019-05-22T13:34:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-22
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Andrology, 2007, vol. 30, n. 2es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10612/10817
dc.descriptionP. 88-98es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to find the relationship between fertility (as 90‐day non‐return rates) and DNA fragmentation assessed by two techniques [sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and Sperm–Bos–Halomax (SBH)]. Furthermore, other quality parameters were achieved (motility, morphological abnormalities, cytoplasmic droplets, viability, capacitation and acrosomal and mitochondrial status) and their correlations with fertility were analysed. Bulls were divided into three fertility groups: high [non‐return rate (NRR) ≥ 80], medium (80 < NRR ≥ 70) and low (70 < NRR > 40). The results of this study indicate that there is a good correlation between fertility and different parameters of sperm quality (SBH and SCSA parameters, % of spermatozoa with head, neck and total abnormalities, and % of spermatozoa with proximal cytoplasmic droplets) and differences between fertility groups were observed in some of them (SBH and SCSA parameters and % of spermatozoa with head, neck and total abnormalities). In this sense, SBH parameters rendered good correlations with fertility (r = −0.42 using bright light microscope and r = −0.47 with fluorescence). Also, standard deviation of DNA fragmentation index (SD‐DFI) and DFIh (cells with High DNA fragmentation index) showed good correlations with fertility (r = −0.41 and r = −0.29). No correlations were observed between SCSA and SBH parameters. A multiple regression shows that four parameters (% of proximal cytoplasmic droplets, % of intact acrosomes in total population, SD‐DFI and percentage of fragmented DNA detected by bright light microscope) present a good predictive value of the fertility of sperm samples (r2 = 0.34, p < 0.001)es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sones_ES
dc.subjectVeterinariaes_ES
dc.subject.otherBulles_ES
dc.subject.otherDNAes_ES
dc.subject.otherHalomaxes_ES
dc.subject.otherSperm chromatin structure assayes_ES
dc.subject.otherSpermes_ES
dc.titleDNA fragmentation assessment by flow cytometry and Sperm–Bos–Halomax (bright‐field microscopy and fluorescence microscopy) in bull spermes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/preprintes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem