The Basic Categories and Assumptions for Contemporary Chinese Argumentation Studies

Título

dc.contributor.author	Qiang, Zhou
dc.date	2016
dc.date.accessioned	2022-02-22T13:33:23Z
dc.date.available	2022-02-22T13:33:23Z
dc.identifier.issn	2444-832X
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10612/13950
dc.description.abstract	本文系统梳理当前中国学术界对论辩的界定、论辩阶段、论辩类型、论辩方法、论辩原则等相关范畴的研究，提取出当代中国论辩研究所形成的基本设定，并进一步分析其形成原因。 A systemic study of argumentation in definition, stages, types, techniques, and principles of argumentation has been reflected. Based on this reflection, the basic assumptions of contemporary Chinese argumentation studies have been drawn upon. Finally, the underlying reasons for the present situation have been analyzed.	es_ES
dc.language	zho	es_ES
dc.publisher	Universidad de León: Instituto Confucio	es_ES
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Lenguas	es_ES
dc.subject	Lingüística	es_ES
dc.subject.other	Argumentación	es_ES
dc.title	The Basic Categories and Assumptions for Contemporary Chinese Argumentation Studies	es_ES
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodical	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.18002/sin.v3i2.5261
dc.identifier.essn	2531-2219
dc.journal.title	Sinología hispánica	es_ES
dc.volume.number	3	es_ES
dc.issue.number	2	es_ES
dc.page.initial	67	es_ES
dc.page.final	78	es_ES

Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional