Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorFacultad de Veterinariaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorEkhlas, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Sanjuán, Juan M.
dc.contributor.authorManzanilla, Edgar G.
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Finola C.
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Rodríguez, Héctor 
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Catherine M.
dc.contributor.otherSanidad Animales_ES
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T12:54:42Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T12:54:42Z
dc.identifier.citationEkhlas, D., Sanjuán, J. M. O., Manzanilla, E. G., Leonard, F. C., Argüello, H., & Burgess, C. M. (2023). Comparison of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli isolated from Irish commercial pig farms with and without zinc oxide and antimicrobial usage. Gut Pathogens, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S13099-023-00534-3es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://gutpathogens.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13099-023-00534-3es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10612/18457
dc.description.abstract[EN] Background The prophylactic use of antimicrobials and zinc oxide (ZnO) in pig production was prohibited by the European Union in 2022 due to potential associations between antimicrobial and heavy metal usage with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and concerns regarding environmental pollution. However, the efects of their usage on the bacterial AMR profles on commercial pig farms are still not fully understood and previous studies examining the efect of ZnO have reported contrasting fndings. The objective of this study was to examine the efects of antimicrobial and ZnO usage on AMR on commercial pig farms. Faecal and environmental samples were taken on 10 Irish commercial farms, of which 5 farms regularly used ZnO and antimicrobials (amoxicillin or sulphadiazine-trimethoprim) for the prevention of disease. The other 5 farms did not use ZnO or any other form of prophylaxis. Escherichia coli numbers were quantifed from all samples using non-supplemented and supplemented Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide agar. Results In total 351 isolates were phenotypically analysed, and the genomes of 44 AmpC/ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from 4 farms were characterised using whole-genome sequencing. Phenotypic analysis suggested higher numbers of multi-drug resistant (MDR) E. coli isolates on farms using prophylaxis. Furthermore, farms using prophylaxis were associated with higher numbers of isolates resistant to apramycin, trimethoprim, tetracycline, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol, while resistance to ciprofoxacin was more associated with farms not using any prophylaxis. Thirty-four of the 44 AmpC/ESBL-producing E. coli strains harboured the blaCTX-M-1 resistance gene and were multi drug resistant (MDR). Moreover, network analysis of plasmids and analysis of integrons showed that antimicrobial and biocide resistance genes were frequently co-located on mobile genetic elements, indicating the possibility for co-selection during antimicrobial or biocide usage as a contributor to AMR occurrence and persistence on farms. Conclusions The results of this study showed evidence that antimicrobial and ZnO treatment of pigs post-weaning can favour the selection and development of AMR and MDR E. coli. Co-location of resistance genes on mobile genetic elements was observed. This study demonstrated the usefulness of phenotypic and genotypic detection of antimicrobial resistance by combining sequencing and microbiological methods.es_ES
dc.languagespaes_ES
dc.publisherBMCes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectVeterinariaes_ES
dc.subject.otherPig farmses_ES
dc.subject.otherAntimicrobial prophylaxises_ES
dc.subject.otherZinc oxidees_ES
dc.subject.otherAntimicrobial resistancees_ES
dc.subject.otherMulti-drug resistancees_ES
dc.subject.otherEscherichia coles_ES
dc.subject.otherWhole-genome sequencinges_ES
dc.titleComparison of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli isolated from Irish commercial pig farms with and without zinc oxide and antimicrobial usagees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/S13099-023-00534-3
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.essn1757-4749
dc.journal.titleGut Pathogenses_ES
dc.volume.number15es_ES
dc.issue.number1es_ES
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.unesco3109 Ciencias Veterinariases_ES
dc.description.projectThis study was funded by the Teagasc Walsh Scholarship scheme (ref 2018027). Héctor Argüello is granted by the Spanish Ministry of Education under the programme “Beatriz Galindo” (BEAGAL-18-106).es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional